Slot Receivers Vs Patriots

Coming out of their Week 9 bye, the Los Angeles Rams knew they would be tested immediately. Three of their first opponents were teams with records above .500, featuring not only great quarterbacks, but also dynamic receiving groups.

• What Is A Slot Receiver
• Patriots Slot Receiver
• Slot Receiver Vs Wide Receiver

The Seahawks, Buccaneers and Cardinals all have true No. 1 receivers on their rosters, and in the case of the Seahawks and Bucs, they have multiple players who would be considered No. 1 wideouts on most teams.

DK Metcalf.
Tyler Lockett.
Antonio Brown.
Mike Evans.
Chris Godwin.
DeAndre Hopkins.

After throwing passes to wide receivers in the slot 51.8 and 51.3 percent of the time in 2016 and 2017, the league threw 55.2 percent of passes to wide receivers in the slot last year. The results suggest the league is still not at equilibrium, but the DVOA difference between slot and wide passes did cut in half from 6.7% to 3.4%. Fantasy Football position vs. Defensive stats from CBSSports.com. Wide Receivers Slot vs. Brandin Cooks had lined up out wide on more than 70 percent of his targets with the Patriots in 2017. In contrast, the Rams used him the way the Saints did two years ago, with about 70 percent of his targets coming from the slot. Cooks has excelled both in the slot and out wide each of the last three.

Ultimately, I think the Patriots only keep five or six wide receivers with Byrd, Lee, Olszewski and the undrafted guys having the best shots to round out the roster.

All six of those receivers have one thing in common: Each one was kept in check by the Rams in the last four weeks. Not a single one of those players eclipsed 70 yards receiving. Only one of them (Lockett) averaged more than 10 yards per catch. Combined, they scored three touchdowns and averaged less than six catches each against L.A.

The only receiver to have success against the Rams since their Week 9 bye was Deebo Samuel, who caught 11 passes for 133 yards in San Francisco’s Week 12 win – most of which came after the catch.

What the Rams did to this group of six receivers, however, was remarkable. Most importantly, L.A. won all three games against their respective teams. But it’s impossible to ignore the fact that none of them had a significant impact on the game.

Take a look at their stat lines from Weeks 10, 11 and 13.

Jalen Ramsey played a big part in shutting down Metcalf, Evans and Hopkins, who he was essentially asked to shadow. None of them did much of anything, with Evans’ touchdown coming on the opposite side of the field as Ramsey, and Hopkins’ coming on a pick play where Ramsey was essentially blocked by a tight end.

But Ramsey isn’t the only one who deserves credit for this stellar performance. Darious Williams and Troy Hill also stepped up in a big way against the No. 2 and 3 receivers. The only time before Week 10 that Metcalf was shut down – Week 7 against the Cardinals – Lockett went off for 15 catches, 200 yards and three touchdowns. Against the Rams, when Metcalf was also neutralized, Lockett was held to five catches for 66 yards.

Ramsey did a good job on Evans, but Williams and Hill held their own against Brown and Godwin, both of whom are Pro Bowl receivers. They limited big plays and were there to wrap up after the catch.

Against the Cardinals, the jobs of Williams and Hill were much easier. Larry Fitzgerald wasn’t available, leaving Christian Kirk and Andy Isabella as the second and third options. They combined for three catches and 9 yards on eight targets. Again, non-factors.

This secondary was tested by a group of extremely talented receivers and passed with flying colors. In those three games, the Rams didn’t allow more than 220 yards to a single quarterback – and those quarterbacks are no slouches, either: Russell Wilson, Tom Brady and Kyler Murray.

Yes, a good pass rush helps, but it’s a testament to the talent in L.A.’s defensive backfield. If it’s not already considered the best in the NFL, it’s deserving of that title.

In the NFL, preparation and game planning is a function of probability and tendency. The game is defined by matchups, some more visible and seemingly more important than others, particularly in the passing game.

What I find truly fascinating in Super Bowl 46 is the matchup of the Giants 3 wide receiver personnel versus the Patriots pass defense. As we know, Victor Cruz almost always aligns in the slot when the Giants go 3 wide. Cruz was the most productive slot receiver in the NFL in 2011. I charted every one of his catches in the regular season and the 3 post-season wins, and the numbers were truly revealing. 75% of his receptions, and 77% of his yards came from the slot. There is no question that’s a strong tendency.

Victor Cruz catching the football vs the Falcons (AP)

Recall what Cruz did to San Francisco’s Carlos Rogers in the NFC Championship game. Rogers was the slot corner in the 49ers nickel sub-package. He had an excellent year in that role, a Pro Bowl year. In the first half, with Rogers predominantly matched man-to-man, Cruz had 8 catches for 125 yards.

The paramount point is Cruz is a very difficult assignment in the slot. As I turn my attention to the Super Bowl, I’m struggling to get a handle on the Patriots matchup approach. All season, Bill Belichick has mixed and matched in his secondary, using an unforeseen combination of undrafted and street free agents, and wide receivers like Matt Slater and Julian Edelman. When the Patriots and Giants played back in early November, the nickel corner was Philip Adams, who three weeks later, was released.

Over the last month, New England’s defensive backfield has primarily been configured this way versus 3 wide receiver personnel: Sterling Moore and Kyle Arrington on the outside, Devin McCourty and Patrick Chung at safety, and Edelman in the slot.

Edelman matched on Cruz? That matchup would require Belichick to do a lot of creative double team and bracket coverage concepts on Cruz. That could potentially compromise other elements of the coverage, and the pass rush, since more bodies would be needed in the back end.

Keep in mind that Hakeem Nicks did not play in the first matchup. He’s a tough cover on the outside. And the Giants at times feature “3 x 1” sets with Nicks the single receiver to one side and 3 other receivers to the opposite side, one of those being Cruz in the slot.

It is possible to take away 2 receivers on any given snap. Belichick will have a great feel for the Giants route combinations based on receiver distribution and location: that is, how many receivers align to each side, and who those receivers are. That’s how coverages, especially zone concepts, are often designed and executed.

Belichick understands he is limited from a personnel standpoint in the secondary. He must camouflage, and compensate for that liability. If Edelman is the slot corner in Super Bowl 46, and I’m not convinced he will be, you can be sure you will not see many snaps of man coverage. That’s a risky proposition.

What Is A Slot Receiver

In trying to get a handle on the Cruz matchup, I keep coming back to a concept Belichick has used effectively in the past. I call it the “bullseye” approach. Belichick targets a single player whom he feels is most critical to the success of the opposing offense, and he focuses his game plan on that specific player. The most celebrated illustration was Super Bowl 36, when Belichick zeroed in on Marshall Faulk and minimized his affect on the game.

Patriots Slot Receiver

Bill Belichick (AP)

I would not be surprised to see Belichick at times put the “bullseye” on Cruz in the 3 wide receiver personnel grouping. I have seen him align linebacker Rob Ninkovich over slot receivers to physically prevent them from getting off the line of scrimmage cleanly. That disrupts, even for a heartbeat, the timing of the passing game. The corollary point, and an important one: Ninkovich would then rush the quarterback. Because of his initial alignment over the slot, the offensive pass protection did not account for him.

Another factor compels the “bullseye” concept versus Cruz and the Giants. By limiting the speed and efficiency with which Cruz can release off the line, it severely lessens his ability to be an immediate vertical threat. He cannot race into the secondary and force safeties to have to react quickly. The practical result is Cruz can then be played solely by the slot corner, without deep safety help over the top. Another body does not need to be allocated to defend him. That gives New England more coverage versatility with which to defend Nicks and Mario Manningham.

Cruz is one of the biggest wild cards in Super Bowl 46. I can’t wait to see how Belichick tactically defends him. I believe that could well determine who raises the Vince Lombardi trophy.

Slot Receiver Vs Wide Receiver

Who does Greg think will win Super Bowl 46?
Find out later this week here at TCIPF.